-
Type: Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority: Critical
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: 1.22
-
Fix Version/s: 1.23
-
Component/s: Basic-Nucl
-
Story Points:3
-
Tests Type:GUI automatic
-
Sprint:DEV-23-2
-
Affect Type:Userdefined
- Open "data/samples/Genbank/PBR322.gb".
- Actions -> Analyze -> Find restriction sites.
- Choose the enzymes AaaI and AagI.
- Click "OK".
- Actions -> Cloning -> Digest into fragments.
- Click "Add All".
- Click "OK".
=> The report contains 2 fragments:1: From AagI (27) To AaaI (939) - 913 bp
2: From AaaI (944) To AagI (24) - 3442 bpBut created annotations are named in different order: "Fragment 1" for 944-24 and "Fragment 2" for 27-939.
In addition, consider another way of fragments ordering: from the biggest fragment to the smallest one. See the request here:
Moreover I would name them in decreasing length order (fragment 1, the biggest) which is the criteria I've seen in these kind of analysis.